Recent Posts

Obama Pushes Tax Plan to Give His Party, and His Legacy, a Lift

January 19, 2015

Placeholder ImageBarack Obama this week will lay the foundation for the last two years of his presidency. Helping middle- and lower-income households will be the cornerstone.

Obama is trying to shore up his legacy an…

Read more

Charlie Hebdo stands in long tradition of provocative humor

January 15, 2015

Placeholder ImageLONDON (AP) — Charlie Hebdo, the satirical weekly that lost 12 staff in a terrorist gun attack last week, is one of a diverse group of publications and comics around the world determined to push the b…

Read more

Modifying gene may be solution to female infertility, study finds

January 14, 2015

Placeholder ImageStress has been known to prevent fertility and cause miscarriages, but scientists have now shown that knocking down a single gene may be able to offset these effects.

Researchers at the University of…

Read more

SpaceX scrubs rocket launch: why it must wait until Friday to try again

January 6, 2015

Placeholder ImageThe launch of a resupply mission bound for the International Space Station was called off less than two minutes before liftoff early Tuesday after a malfunction cropped up related to the motor on the …

Read more

Ambush killings of police spiked in 2014, but still remain rare

December 30, 2014

Placeholder ImageWASHINGTON — On-the-job police fatalities rose in 2014, led by a 56 percent increase in shooting deaths, according to preliminary figures released Tuesday by a nonprofit foundation.

Fifteen of the …

Read more

View older posts »

Search on eBlog

How emails can be Used in Court as Evidence

November 7, 2012

Emails are a highly effective way to present evidence in court. While it might seem to be a very casual and informal way of communication, the information passed through email could contain information that is highly relevant and important to a case in all types of legal cases, criminal,divorce and immigration to name a few. There are both benefits and drawbacks for lawyers to attempt to use emails are solid evidence during court cases. The benefits include the personal messages that can reveal the truth about the situation. The drawbacks include that since no signature is present, it could be debatable who actually wrote the email. Despite the controversy, email messages are a modern way to use communication as evidence in a court of law. Emails are a highly effective way to present evidence in court. While it might seem to be a very casual and informal way of communication, the information passed through email could contain information that is highly relevant and important to a case in all types of legal cases, criminal,divorce and immigration to name a few. There are both benefits and drawbacks for lawyers to attempt to use emails are solid evidence during court cases. The benefits include the personal messages that can reveal the truth about the situation. The drawbacks include that since no signature is present, it could be debatable who actually wrote the email. Despite the controversy, email messages are a modern way to use communication as evidence in a court of law. 

The benefit to presenting emails as evidence in court is that the messages passed by email by the parties in question are most likely communicating very candidly about their feelings about the subject. They are more likely to reveal factual information than the story that they are telling to the police, their attorney or the court room. While it may seem like insignificant banter between two people, it may reveal the truth about events or situations in question during a court case. For example, an immigration lawyer might be presented with a case in which a couple is believed to be faking a marriage in order for one of the parties to obtain a green card. In this situation, the emails that both parties are writing to either each other or to outside parties might reveal the marriage as a sham. Email correspondence can be very useful in a court of law. 

The drawback to presenting email documents as evidence is validity. While it take a password to enter someone's email account, passwords as easily obtained and therefore someone other than the indicated sender might have drafted and sent the email. It could be very easy for someone with sinister intentions to log onto and create an email that might suggest that the person I question relayed information that they did not. As there is no original signature on an email document, it is less valid than a hand written document or even one that was signed. 

Comment