Recent Posts

Tsarnaev guilty on all charges in Boston Marathon bombing

April 8, 2015

In this courtroom sketch, defense attorney Judy Clarke is depicted addressing the jury as defendant Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, right, sits during closing arguments in Tsarnaev's federal death penalty trial Monday, April 6, 2015, in Boston. Tsarnaev is charged with conspiring with his brother to place two bombs near the Boston Marathon finish line in April 2013, killing three and injuring more than 260 people.

BOSTON Dzhokhar Tsarnaev was convicted on all charges Wednesday in the Boston Marathon bombing by a federal jury that now must decide whether the 21-year-old former college student should be execute…

Read more

Breast milk sold online often contaminated by cow's milk

April 6, 2015

Placeholder ImageThanks to successful public health campaigns and greater awareness, more new moms in the U.S. and elsewhere are warming up to the idea that "breast is best."However, some women run into challenges wit…

Read more

Chrome OS Gets Major Push from Google

April 1, 2015

Android, Google’s mobile operating system and Apple’s iOS have about the same market share in the U.S., however in emerging regions, Android is poised to dominate, at least for the next couple of year…

Read more

Dunkin’ Donuts considers using only cage-free eggs

March 30, 2015

10% of eggs used to make breakfast sandwiches in the U.S. will be cage free by the end of 2016.

Dunkin’ Donuts is exploring the possibility of only using 100% cage-free eggs across the company’…

Read more

The four best podcast apps for Android phones

March 27, 2015

Placeholder Image

Podcasts remain a lively and popular forum for online broadcasting, even with a name that calls back to the era of the iPod.

As an Android user you’ve probably long broken free of the Apple eco…

Read more

View older posts »

Search on eBlog

How emails can be Used in Court as Evidence

November 7, 2012

Emails are a highly effective way to present evidence in court. While it might seem to be a very casual and informal way of communication, the information passed through email could contain information that is highly relevant and important to a case in all types of legal cases, criminal,divorce and immigration to name a few. There are both benefits and drawbacks for lawyers to attempt to use emails are solid evidence during court cases. The benefits include the personal messages that can reveal the truth about the situation. The drawbacks include that since no signature is present, it could be debatable who actually wrote the email. Despite the controversy, email messages are a modern way to use communication as evidence in a court of law. Emails are a highly effective way to present evidence in court. While it might seem to be a very casual and informal way of communication, the information passed through email could contain information that is highly relevant and important to a case in all types of legal cases, criminal,divorce and immigration to name a few. There are both benefits and drawbacks for lawyers to attempt to use emails are solid evidence during court cases. The benefits include the personal messages that can reveal the truth about the situation. The drawbacks include that since no signature is present, it could be debatable who actually wrote the email. Despite the controversy, email messages are a modern way to use communication as evidence in a court of law. 

The benefit to presenting emails as evidence in court is that the messages passed by email by the parties in question are most likely communicating very candidly about their feelings about the subject. They are more likely to reveal factual information than the story that they are telling to the police, their attorney or the court room. While it may seem like insignificant banter between two people, it may reveal the truth about events or situations in question during a court case. For example, an immigration lawyer might be presented with a case in which a couple is believed to be faking a marriage in order for one of the parties to obtain a green card. In this situation, the emails that both parties are writing to either each other or to outside parties might reveal the marriage as a sham. Email correspondence can be very useful in a court of law. 

The drawback to presenting email documents as evidence is validity. While it take a password to enter someone's email account, passwords as easily obtained and therefore someone other than the indicated sender might have drafted and sent the email. It could be very easy for someone with sinister intentions to log onto and create an email that might suggest that the person I question relayed information that they did not. As there is no original signature on an email document, it is less valid than a hand written document or even one that was signed. 

Comment